Showing posts with label YTL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label YTL. Show all posts

Saturday, June 14, 2008

Asian Wall Street Journal Survey

Infrastructure and property company YTL Corp. topped the category of long-term vision. A YTL unit's joint venture in March 2007 was awarded one of several licenses for WiMax, a system for wireless broadband connectivity over a larger area than Wi-Fi hot spots can provide.

This is the 10th consecutive year that YTL has won this accolade, 7 of which was in The Far Eastern Economic Review. Tan Sri Francis Yeoh, Managing Director of YTL group said, “ I thank all the readers for this recognition and I want most to thank our Lord Jesus for once again perfuming YTL’s name. I give Him all the glory.”

By PETER JEFFREY

When Morten Lundal took over as chief executive of the Malaysian mobile-phone company DiGi Telecommunications Sdn. Bhd. about four years ago, he noticed something odd: DiGi was making many customers sign a two-year contract.

His senior staff told him, "Well, that's just the way it is for every company in the world," recalled Mr. Lundal, who has since moved to the British carrier Vodafone Group PLC.

His response: "But why, why, why, though? If a customer wants to leave us, we can't stop them anyway."

DiGi, Malaysia's third-biggest mobile-phone company by subscribers, behind Maxis Communications Bhd. and the Celcom (Malaysia) Bhd. unit of Telekom Malaysia Bhd., did away with the two-year lock-in on most domestic contracts. It tried other things new to Malaysia, too, such as introducing a single rate for all prepaid customers -- who buy blocks of minutes in advance -- regardless of time, distance and location.

Mr. Lundal's admitted "obsession" with simplicity and change helps explain why DiGi took Malaysia's top prize in the featured category, "Innovative in Responding to Customer Needs," in The Wall Street Journal Asia's Asia 200 survey of readers. DiGi was named the most innovative Malaysian company in the 2006 survey as well. It ranked fourth in this survey's overall assessment, down from third place.

A total of 2,477 executives and professionals participated in the survey, which was conducted last year between May 11 and July 3. On behalf of The Wall Street Journal, market-research firm Colmar Brunton polled subscribers as well as other businesspeople in the 12 Asian-Pacific countries.



Nestlé (Malaysia) Bhd., a publicly traded unit of Switzerland's Nestlé SA, earned the top spot as overall most-admired Malaysian company. Readers voted it No. 1 in the categories of corporate reputation and quality of its products and services, and No. 3 in innovation.

Maxis was second in the overall most-admired rankings after topping the list in 2006. Maxis is the biggest of the top three Malaysian mobile players by subscribers. It is this survey's No. 2 Malaysian innovator.

DiGi is small by comparison -- its annual revenue is less than Maxis' operating profit. But it is competitive. Its overall mobile market share by revenue has grown to 26% from 16% four years ago.

Mr. Lundal, 43 years old, took the helm in July 2004 after serving for seven years as an executive at Telenor ASA of Norway, which controls DiGi with a 49% stake. He left DiGi earlier this year for a senior international role with Vodafone, which has its own ambitions for the Asian cellular market.

His successor as CEO of DiGi is Johan Eric Dennelind, 38, most recently chief marketing officer of Telenor Sweden. Mr. Dennelind knows DiGi well, having served as its chief financial officer and chief marketing officer from 2004 to 2007 and played a key role in fulfilling Mr. Lundal's vision of simplicity and dynamism at the company.

"It comes down to people who live and breathe the aspirations of DiGi," says Mr. Dennelind.

"People have the DNA of thinking differently, so you just encourage them to dare to do what they think," he says, recalling how he freed employees to create "1 Low Flat Rate," a centerpiece of DiGi's marketing efforts that addresses the multiple-rate clutter of the Malaysian mobile market.

Mr. Dennelind sees retaining and attracting bold thinkers as DiGi's top internal challenge. When a job candidate arrives, he might take the candidate right into a DiGi meeting, not only to test him or her but also to make sure DiGi's own people respond well to interaction and surprise.

External challenges include macroeconomic factors, like a Malaysian fuel-subsidy reduction that could pinch consumer spending in the mobile market, and competition.

"We have been in a cozy, three-player market for a while," Mr. Dennelind says. "We now have to be mindful of new entrants."

The increasing saturation of the Malaysian cellphone market, with a penetration rate of more than 80%, doesn't help -- though Mr. Dennelind puts it somewhere around 70% when multiple SIM cards and Malaysia's large migrant population are taken into account. Over the past few years, industry profit margins have come under pressure from increased competition and are likely to face further pressure from higher customer acquisition and retention costs, though economies of scale have proved a boon to some, including DiGi. Rivalry is expected to grow sharper this year with the introduction of number portability, which will allow subscribers to take their cellphone numbers with them to a new provider.

DiGi must "strike a balance between offering a basic voice service and other value-added services, such as data to drive longer-term ARPUs," or average revenue per user, says Jeffrey Tan, senior vice president of OSK Investment Bank Research, based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. He thinks DiGi, as a small and scrappy player, is well positioned in this environment. It now has "third-generation" spectrum and is expected to roll out more high-speed and advanced data services in the second half to capture higher-ARPU subscribers from its stronger rivals.

Mr. Dennelind is clearly excited about the 3G opportunities, and the chance to "bring Internet to the people, on both big and small screens." What are his plans? "We're playing our cards close to the chest," he says. "But expect surprises."

While DiGi focuses on the Malaysian market, Maxis owner T. Ananda Krishnan has taken his company private, largely to facilitate regional expansion. Allan Khoo, head of brand and marketing communications at Maxis, says that since the brand was established, in 1995, it has been based on "value, innovation and trust," attracting a customer base that now numbers 10 million in Malaysia. Mr. Khoo points to Maxis' mobile-data business as an example of the company's own innovation.

"Maxis has the largest and most-visited mobile [wireless application protocol] portal in Malaysia, with over 200 products and services, including the largest catalog of mobile music and games, mobile TV channels and other infotainment services, like football updates, news alerts and services to check traffic," he says, also noting Maxis' service for international remittance over mobile phones. "What all this technology translates to is simply this: The phone is not just a phone, but an extension of our customer's personality and lifestyle," driving Maxis to innovate.

One reason Nestlé (Malaysia), which is 72.6%-owned by Nestlé SA, won the gold appears to be because of what it isn't doing differently. Many of Nestlé's brands, including the Milo malted chocolate drink, enjoy an iconic status in Malaysia, where the company has a 95-year history and people drink more Milo than Coke.

"You don't order hot chocolate when you go out -- you order a Milo. Or you order fried Maggi" noodles, a Nestlé brand, says Foong Wai Loke, an analyst who covers the consumer sector for Credit Suisse. "They supply all these at the street-side eating places in Malaysia."

At the same time, Nestlé has allowed its brands to evolve. Milo began as a drink, then became a chocolate candy, a cereal and an ice cream. The company also has adapted to new trends. When smaller companies began offering flavored instant coffee, Nestlé brought out its own line.

The company has been working on a healthier image, as with its Maggi Tastylite instant noodles, which are air-dried instead of fried, a process that can reduce fat content by 60% to 80%, the company says. Nestlé now markets Milo as a nutritious chocolate malt drink that provides energy. Nestlé also has been making a name for itself as a provider of halal foods -- those permissible under Islam -- in Asia, the Middle East, Europe and Australia.



Nestlé faces some challenges of its own. For one, it must walk a tightrope between swallowing the rising cost of commodities, like palm oil and coffee, and passing it on to consumers. "Nestlé will continue with internal savings initiatives through operational efficiencies to avoid passing on the costs to consumers wherever possible," says group corporate-affairs manager Tengku Marina Tunku Annuar Badlishah.

Other notable names in Malaysia include Public Bank Bhd., the No. 3 most-admired company overall. Early in 2006, Public Bank, Malaysia's second-largest bank by assets, bought Hong Kong's Asia Commercial Bank, which it hopes will be a stepping stone to the China banking business. The company says it will establish an Islamic-banking subsidiary in the third quarter, addressing that burgeoning market. In April, the bank opened its Public China Titans Fund, which allows investors to tap into the growth prospects of large-cap stocks in the Greater China region.

Infrastructure and property company YTL Corp. topped the category of long-term vision. A YTL unit's joint venture in March 2007 was awarded one of several licenses for WiMax, a system for wireless broadband connectivity over a larger area than Wi-Fi hot spots can provide.

Genting Bhd., which took the top spot for financial reputation in the survey, nonetheless reported a 33% decline in this year's first-quarter net profit, partly because of lower earnings from its U.K. gambling business. However, the results also suffered from comparison with the year-earlier quarter, when the company realized some substantial gains. By contrast, revenue was up 6.6% to 2.16 billion ringgit ($660 million), thanks to the company's diversified business model and rising crude palm-oil prices. Besides owning Malaysia's only casino, Genting has interests in palm oil, oil exploration, power production and property development. Sister company Star Cruises Ltd., which shares a majority owner with Genting, is buying a 75% stake in a project in the Chinese gambling hot spot of Macau that will include a hotel and possibly a casino.

--Celine Fernandez contributed to this article.



Top Blogs

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Govt should rethink KL-S’pore fast train?

I'm still hold my standing. No way government is going to approve the project in near 3 years time. No way, and why?

Firstly, China's budget deficit is significantly lower than Malaysia in percentage wise. In terms of tax revenues/GDP, China is definitely a few order magnitude stronger than Malaysia. Therefore the capital/resources available at China government disposal obviously afford for more large projects.

Secondly, if everyone wish is granted without prioritization, government is going to go broke or the expenditures will be repaid by our future generations, a.k.a. generational effects.

Thirdly, energy efficiency is a big concern, yes, but not to the extent that inflation brings. Current oil rushes, imho, are just temporary and once the fever over, we shall see a back-fire effect of spending too much money on so called energy efficiency mega projects. I'm not totally against efforts to cut down global warming effects, but sometimes the benefits those projects promise outweigh by the opportunity cost of spending it to improve poverty situation.

The people in economy planning unit are not stupid, as as a matter of fact they might be the top of the cream in the country. Balancing economy cycle is daunting task and why we want to risk a project that might fail in favour of those that guarantee higher rate of sucess?

Just my cents, no offense.




Govt should rethink KL-S’pore fast train

WHILE China managed to upgrade the existing railway train system to about 200km/hr for interlink cities like Shanghai to Zhejiang, Suzhou, our Government rejects the proposal to have a KL-Singapore high-speed train.

I’m a Johorian working in the Klang Valley. Travelling to Kota Baru or Kuala Terengganu takes six to eight hours. How I wish there were a high-speed train service to travel there in three to four hours.

The long hours of travel just make me opt for a vacation in Bali, Phuket, instead of Kota Baru or Kuala Terengganu.

Moreover, energy efficiency is a big concern for us in future, high-speed trains surely saves us the cost and time.

In addition, the economy will receive a boost with the high-speed rail connection and tourism will be greatly enhanced because more tourists will be on the go domestically.

I hope alternative improvements can be done to the existing railway system in Malaysia in the mean time.

Competition necessitates improvement. If KTM can’t perform, why we should let it monopolise and delay our momentum?

C.K. LAU,

Petaling Jaya, Selangor.

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Tan Sri Yeoh Tiong Lay among recipients of exemplary Hokkiens award

I'm a Hokkien too. Cheers :)


Tan Sri Yeoh Tiong Lay among recipients of exemplary Hokkiens award


Tan Sri Yeoh Tiong Lay
The Star Online, April 25, 2008

FORMER Penang chief minister Tun Lim Chong Eu and ex-MCA president Tun Dr Ling Liong Sik are among 10 recipients of the Exemplary Malaysians Hokkien Award, reported Nanyang Siang Pau.

The others are YTL Corp patriarch Tan Sri Yeoh Tiong Lay, palm oil king Tan Sri Lee Shin Cheng, Tan Sri Tong Yoke Kim, Sarawak-based timber tycoon Tan Sri Tiong Hiew King, Tan Sri Quek Leng Chan of Hong Leong Group, philanthropist Tan Sri Kuek Ho Yao, property tycoon Tan Sri Low Keng Seng and Chinese educationist Datuk Sim Mow Yu.

The award was established in conjunction with the 50th anniversary of The Federation of Hokkien Association of Malaysia.

Organising chairman Tan Kim Leong said another 40 people from the Hokkien clan would also be presented the Outstanding Malaysians Hokkien Award.

However, he said the 40 names would be announced at a grand award-giving ceremony at Palm Garden Hotel, IOI Resort in Putrajaya on Sunday.

He said the recipients were selected based on their excellent performance in their respective fields as well as their great contributions to the society and country.

He said it took them almost a year to come out with the list of recipients.

Friday, April 25, 2008

Call of the Red Seas

Call of the Red Seas


Modest beginnings
Wealth Magazine, April 24, 2008

Like many Southeast Asian conglomerates, YTL is the product of several generations of sheer industriousness and a do-or-die sense of urgency.



Tan Sri Dato' Francis Yeoh's late grandfather, Yeoh Cheng Liam, left Fujian province in China in 1920 with not much more than a few dollars and a bag of clothes. He landed in what was then known as Malaya and found work in a timber shop. He saved up and started a timber business.



His son Yeoh Tiong Lay began working at age 13 to help pay for his siblings' education. He eventually started a construction company called Syarikat Pembenaan Yeoh Tiong Lay (Yeoh Tiong Lay Building Company) in 1955. It later became YTL, his initials.



It was not uncommon for him to take his seven children to the construction sites, and Tan Sri Francis can still recall the smell of cement.



The company's first construction projects were garrisons, army housing, hospitals and low-cost housing in Malaysia. When the energy crisis of the 1970s struck Malaysia, the business teetered at the brink of collapse as oil prices spiked about 20-fold within a brief period. The company's margins were too tiny to absorb the surge in costs.



The family's relatives and staff pawned their jewellery to keep the company afloat. For Tan Sri Francis, it was an early lesson that loyalty and staff are invaluable assets.



He was 16 at that time and was already supervising construction sites during weekends and holidays. Being the eldest of seven children, he offered to drop out of school, where he was the head boy, to help his father. The offer was sternly rejected.



The patriarch's reason presaged YTL's financial innovations in the future: Without formal training in engineering, he could not foresee the need for fluctuation clauses and other risk management techniques, he explained. Hence, the future of the company depended on Tan Sri Francis completing his education and receiving a degree in engineering.



The punctilious young man dutifully went to Kingston University in the UK and earned a degree in civil engineering. Upon his return to Malaysia in 1978, aged 24, his father appointed him Managing Director.

Today, Tan Sri Dato’ Seri Dr Yeoh Tiong Lay remains Executive Chairman and is said to have a great deal of influence over the group's direction, although his son remains the public face ofYTL. Senior executives who have worked with the group say the patriarch insists on prudence, which explains YTL's conservative approach in all deals. It may have shielded the group from the wreck of the 1997 Asian crisis, when many Asian stars fell because they had significant short-term US-dollar borrowings to finance long-term debt.




YTL Cement
Big Leagues


A year after Tan Sri Francis joined YTL as a degree-holding engineer, his father presented him with a symbol of success: A steel Rolex watch. “A Chinese businessman must have a Rolex,” Tan Sri Francis remarks with a laugh. The next year, it was a gold Rolex.



Thus far, YTL's trajectory is common to many entrepreneurial families in the region. The group could have remained a successful but indistinguishable Chinese family business, but Tan Sri Francis was not one to be content wearing construction boots and a gold Rolex for the rest of his life.



In everything he did, he sought to make a difference. His would be a life of collecting Patek Philippes, Cartier Tanks and Richard Milles, consorting with the likes of Jack Welch and Bill Clinton, and building a diversified business that rewards shareholders consistently.



YTL's entryway into the big leagues came in 1992, when Malaysia suffered a major blackout. It became clear that the national power provider, Tenaga Nasional, could not meet the demands of an economically growing country. The market was opened up to the private sector.



YTL got the country's first independent power producer (IPP) licence in 1993 and was tasked to build and operate two gas fired power plants. They were completed seven months ahead of schedule. But the IPP licence didn't come easily. It was won on the fact that YTL had previously completed several state projects, including Malaysia's first nucleus hospital, months before deadline.



When negotiating the IPP licence, YTL requested and received a deal that critics remember to this day for its audacity: Tenaga Nasional will buy 72% of YTL Power's output at S$0.07per kilowatt hour (kwh) (RMO.152 kwh) for 21 years - even if the national utility didn't need that much capacity. For YTL, it was a hedge against demand risk and a guaranteed income of nearly $500 million a year until September 2015. The IPPs that came later got far less lucrative deals.



In those days, citizens of developing countries typically paid more for electricity than people in developed nations because infrastructure financing in Third World regions like Malaysia and Indonesia came at a premium. Consumers bore the higher financing costs.



Until now, Tan Sri Francis gets incensed at the unfairness of it all. "Why should poorer nations have to pay more? It should be the other way around!" he exclaims.



Indeed, when YTL sought financing for the power plants, the major international banks demanded a premium for the political and other risks that Malaysia and the project were perceived to have. The loans would also be in US dollars, which presented exchange-rate risk for assets with revenues solely in ringgit. YTL refused the unfriendly terms.



To deliver YTL's vision - world-class services at Third World prices -Tan Sri Francis proposed a groundbreaking scheme: YTL would issue 10-year bonds in ringgit and the issue would be subscribed by Malaysia's top institutional investor, the Employee Provident Fund (EPF), a pension fund.



The government bought the idea and YTL issued $660 million {RM1.5 billion) worth of fixed-rate 10% bonds in 1994. It angered sections of the public, but it provided sufficient stability for the first IPP to operate and create a new industry.



Most importantly, it presented a viable financing model to the developing world.



This debt-financing approach became the pin-up model for many other countries wanting to privatise their utilities sectors. YTL was mentioned in every major central bank report, academic study, infrastructure conference and the like.



The Malaysian IPPs that won licences later also adopted a similar financing model. The first five raised more than $4.billion entirely from the domestic market, according to Euromoney and it defended the IPPs from the US dollar's precipitous rise against the ringgit during the Asian crisis.



Over the decades, YTL continued to innovate and surprise (critics would say annoy). In January 2007, YTL Corp raised $141 million (US$101 million) via Malaysia's first overnight sale of treasury shares. In Malaysia, treasury shares normally cannot be sold in overnight placements. But divesting 3.5% of the outstanding share capital on the market would have pressured the stock price downward.



Red Seas


But YTL doesn't win every time. In 1996, the group was given the opportunity to buy 80% of Hong Kong-base Consolidated Electric Power Asia. It would have turned YTL into Asia's largest IPP.



Tan Sri Francis managed once again, in astonishingly bold fashion to arrange for government financing. But he was outbid by a US firm. A banker who advised YTL on the deal said YTL would probably have won if it was listed and had access to the capital markets.



A year later, YTL Power launched an initial public offer, and has a current market cap of $6 billion.

YTL Corp The first to go public, in 1985 has a current market value of $5.6 billion. YTL Cement was listed in 1993 (current market cap $1.1 billion) and YTL e-Solutions a technology company, went public in 2002 (current market cap $327 million).



Starhill Real Estate Investment Trust -which contains Starhill Gallery, Lot 10, JW Marriott and The Ritz-Carlton Residenceas all in Kuala Lumpur –was listed in 2005 (current market cap $484 million). The group's total market cap is more than $13.2 billion, even during a time when the equity markets are battered out of their shells.



The group's compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) has been 55% since 1985 and dividends from all the listed units have been paid consistently each year. Tan Sri Francis often compares his group with Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, in the sense that both companies have delivered unwavering growth over long periods.



In the future, a CAGR of 20% until the year 2020 is realistic considering a relatively substantial base has been built, Tan Sri Francis says. After some thought, he declares "But we've crossed so many red seas eaten so much manna in the desert and still managed to grow by 55%, so I should say we can still do it:'



His ultimate aim is to build YTL into “a force for good. We want to bring joy to people and hopefully they will say, ‘we wish there were more companies like YTL, more leaders like you, more people who are caring.’ ”

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

YTL’s Wessex Water wins Queen’s Award for Enterprise

YTL’s Wessex Water wins Queen’s Award for Enterprise



United Kingdom, April 21, 2008

The company first committed to becoming a sustainable operation in 1997 with the publishing of their first sustainability report. Wessex Water then developed its ‘Sustainability Vision’ which sets out its sustainability goals and the mechanisms to achieve them into five key areas; the environment; outside interests (including customers and communities); employees; infrastructure and finances.



Julian Dennis, director of compliance and sustainability, Wessex Water said: “For Wessex Water, sustainability is not an added extra – it applies to all that we do. Our sustainability vision has been embedded thoroughly within our core business and we have received this prestigious award for our ongoing work. We’re delighted to have the commitment to our sustainability work recognised in this way.”



Wessex Water receives the award for continuous achievement in sustainable operations and an impressive commitment to effect positive change, often establishing new benchmarks in the process. Wessex Water’s key areas of success include:



Increasing its generation of renewable energy as part of its carbon management plan


Implementing ‘Assist’; an innovative, lower tariff to help customers on low incomes


Building an operations centre that is amongst the most sustainable offices in the UK


Its work with farmers to help them reduce the use of nitrates and pesticides, improving the environment and protecting water sources


YTL Group Managing Director said, “ I am indeed very proud that our Wessex Water in UK has won this most coveted award. This award is a further inspiration to all in The YTL Group globally, further enhancing our ‘green’ DNA. I am very proud of all of them”



Work with the Ministry of Justice, National Offender Management Service and Probation and Prison service to develop a scheme that trains offenders, prior to release, to fill roles within Wessex Water


An ongoing education programme; providing primary and secondary education packs to aid the teaching of the water cycle and water conservation within the national curriculum. Wessex Water also provides education advisors who visit schools and staff nine education centres in the region


Managing a thorough programme of communications with ‘stakeholders’ – the people who have an interest in the company, including customers, local communities, employees, regulators, investors and interest groups.


Julian Dennis continues: “We are working with the rest of the water industry on projects to deal with the big issues that the sector faces. We’re taking a lead in promoting best practice. Winning a Queen’s Award for Enterprise is testament to this commitment and our achievements so far.”



The Awards were inaugurated in 1966 as The Queen’s Award to Industry but are these days renamed as The Queen’s Awards for Enterprise divided into International Trade, Innovation and Sustainable Development.

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

KL-S'pore bullet train derailed by high cost

Frankly speaking, no one is surprise by such decision.

It's just too many things on stake if the project is successful. Think about KL-Singapore air route, think about KTM Berhad, think about PLUS Berhad, ..... it's all political!!! Socio-economy factors? My feet.




KL-S'pore bullet train derailed by high cost

PETALING JAYA: The proposed Kuala Lumpur-Singapore multi-billion ringgit bullet train project has been put on hold due to the high cost.

Economic Planning Unit director-general Datuk Seri Sulaiman Mahbob confirmed that the Government had shelved the project but refused to elaborate further.

“The Government will not go ahead with the project because the financial model submitted involves a significant cost to be borne by the Government,” he said when contacted.

He declined to reveal how much the Government would have to bear. He also refused to take further questions on the matter of the bullet train.

The RM8bil train, proposed by YTL Corp Bhd in 2006, was capable of travelling at 350kph and cutting the travelling time between the two cities to 90 minutes.

YTL managing director Tan Sri Francis Yeoh had earlier said that it was an environmentally friendly project and would save the Government “tens of billions of ringgit” in fuel subsidies in the long term.

Yeoh was reported to have said that the Government was supportive of the project.

A feasibility study was carried out last year but the Government said it also wanted to carry out a social impact study as the project required land acquisition.

The project was first proposed by YTL to then Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad in the late 1990s soon after the completion of the high-speed rail link between Kuala Lumpur and the KL International Airport. YTL owns half of the KL-KLIA link.

Dr Mahathir rejected the project because it was not suitable.

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Yeoh: Bullet train project is environment-friendly

Eddy: I love to see this happen.

Eddy: “tens of billion ringgit”savings in fuel subsidy? According to the law of conservation of energy, energy just can't be recreated (Note: In advanced physics, energy do get annihilated). Savings in one area must be causing the excessive consumptions in other places.

Eddy: Hoo Haa, RM8 Billion project!

Eddy: Bottomline is, I just want to have total access to every details of the project. Costing, timing, subcontractor selection process, billing/markup/margin/etc, covenants of every legally binding contracts, blah blah. In other words, the project must be totally transparent to us, for us to judge whether it is truly beneficial.

Eddy: Yeap, I know total transparency is not going to happen, I just murmuring myself here.

P/S- "Environment Friendly" is a globally, widely abused phrase nowadays. Quantifying the impact is the way to go.


Yeoh: Bullet train project is environment-friendly

Business Times, 12th April 2008

YTL Corp Bhd, a construction and energy group, says the government is supportive of its plan to build a bullet train between Kuala Lumpur and Singapore as it makes economic sense.

It is also a project that the people seem to want, managing director Tan Sri Francis Yeoh said.

“This project is economically viable, so I think the government will listen to the people and put this project on an urgent basis again. Nobody looks at it as a mega project, an artificial project that you do for prestige,” he told reporters after launching the YTL organised Climate Change Week 2008.

When pressed by reporters as to when he expects to get the greenlight for the project, he said: “I think the government is supportive of this project. We’ll see.”

The previous transport minister, Datuk Seri Chan Kong Choy, had said in January that the government was conducting a social impact study on the project, said to be about RM8 billion because it involves land acquisition.


“We are for it (the project),” he’d told Reuters in an interview then.

YTL’s bullet train plan involves travel time between KL and Singapore being cut to just 90 minutes compared with existing trains which take about seven hours.

Yeoh said that the bullet train project would not only save the government “tens of billion ringgit” on fuel subsidies over the long term, but would also cut down the country’s carbon emission significantly.

“This is an environment-friendly project,” he remarked.