Showing posts with label Personal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Personal. Show all posts

Saturday, May 25, 2013

Technology is Inevitable to Modern Life Style


Just when I thought my desire to watch movies at cinema was totally diminished after a disappointing experience watching Ironman-3, the release of Star Trek: Into Darkness in IMAX 3D really reignites the economics of utility maximization in my decision making process in determining whether to watch in "Cinema" or "Blu-ray" or "HD format download".



I watched Avater in 3D and it was an OK experience with slight issue with my glasses and I watched another 3D movie which was so inferior that I slept half-way and can't even remember its' name while writing this post.



Skeptism crawled in when I was in the final page of online booking making the credit card payment, well, what the heck, I'm gonna give this entertainment shit one last chance and it turned out to be a great movie experience.

Phew!



Nonetheless, one serious ramification shall be I don't think I would be able to watch any more good movies at cinema without something like IMAX and all "junk" movies goes to home theatre.

Ouch!




Saturday, October 13, 2012

1Z0-536 The Oracle Exadata 11g Essentials


Mr. Larry Elison said in one of his recent appearance when launching Exadata X3-2, "SAP Hana is kinda small... about 0.5TB small. It is indeed small. Mine is bigger." and something like that, although I can't remember his exact words.

Too bad, Mr. Bill Gates' Microsoft ain't jump on the bandwagon yet on a totally Microsoft based appliance. Microsoft is working with alliance partners like HP or so in current appliance wave.

So what's the big deal about appliance based solution?

Yeah? What's the big deal?

Appliance is not something new. Seriously.

Early days of computing solution actually were appliance-based! Computer engineers assembled a dedicated computing machine using their own proprietary hardware, software, networking devices, storage and components with performance centric mentality to maximize utilization of available resources. Use some marketing catch words from principals like IBM and Oracle: Balanced Configuration.

Then computing components became commoditized, leveraging economic of scale, drastically lower down prices, improve adoption and innovations. Too bad, the commoditization happened individually for each component. Solutioning process nowadays spends a hell of time and efforts to assemble these "unbalanced" components together and it requires a hell of group of specialized people like systems engineer, storage expert, network specialist and so on together to make sure the end result can somehow meet the real customer needs.

Change is inevitable. Complexity sucks.

Appliance based deployment lowers complexity.

Wait! Oracle actually try to differentiate appliance and appliance-like platform. Exadata is actually a appliance-like platform. What it really means is that Exadata provides almost full flexibility in operating the Oracle database software as if it is in a non-Exadata environment. A true appliance is more limited in terms of configuration. Emm, the characteristics of these two kinds are usually overlapping and we shouldn't waste too much time to try to identify the idiosyncrasy of both since they shall eventually converge into single definition.

So, there are Netezza, Exadata, SAP HANA, Greenplum, HP Vertica, SmartAnalytics and the list goes longer with many smaller players in the market. Gartner Magic Quadrant paper should be able to point out few names in this area.

Anyway, enough of the gibberish speech about appliance.

I think appliance is great as it will cut down my time in assembling a BOM for proposals, although sometimes the price tag is hard to fit into the budget unless Oracle or any appliance vendor is kindly to give out GREAT bid price for us.

I took and passed 1Z0-536 The Oracle Exadata 11g Essentials. Scored 84% . To me, 84% is a score that has plenty of rooms for improvements. I would attribute this below-than-my-average score to the lack of literature about Exadata in the circulation. This is an area for enhancement. Oracle, please take note.

My preparation materials basically include OPN learning materials about Exadata under the specialization track, "Achieving Extreme Performance with Oracle Exadata (Oracle Press)" and many whitepapers/articles.

Some major subject areas tested in the examination are IORM, Database Machine specs and best practices. I got ambushed by some questions about ASM related attribute and state of the disks. OUCH! No idea at all what the hell they are and I can only count on my common sense. Non-Exadata Oracle specific knowledge would be a great use here.




Thursday, August 23, 2012

MCTS 70-178 Microsoft Project 2010, Managing Projects

Top Blogs



Suddenly I became nostalgic.

You know, Microsoft Project is one of some early batch of software that I used during tertiary education time besides the obvious DOS, Windows operating system, VB (Not .NET you young people!) and et cetera.

I remembered times when being instructed to present my project schedules which ended up with printing of few ten pages of "partial" gantt charts and stitched them together using double sided tapes or glues. Guess not easy to be a project manager during those times. :D

Anyway, transition from the yawning old version of Microsoft Project to the state of the art version of 2010 (2013 on its way) is phenomenal. Number of users grow into millions and with some quarter of them with a chartered PMP qualification. Still, more projects failed in this decade than the total of few previous decades added up. Microsoft Project is just a tool, and it really can't help if you don't understand the essential of managing a project.

Anyway, back to the story of 70-178.

You see, to me, this examination is nothing but just a milestome to tell people that I'm more proficient in using this tool than others. Technically, it's not a tough one either. I have passed various other exams, which I personally think at a different playing field than this exam.

So, don't worry too much if you are taking this exam anytime soon.

What you really need to prepare are:

  • Download the trial version/buy the licensed copy of Microsoft Project 2010
  • Use the software alot, and explore various of its features
  • Understand the basics of project management (If you are a PMP, congrats that you are on a faster track to pass this)
  • Read one or more books on Microsoft Project 2010. I scanned through most of them and I think "Microsoft Project" title from Sybex is short and concise (about 400 pages) whereby "Microsoft Project In Depth" from QuantumPM is indeed, in depth (about 1000 pages).
Well, my passing rate of 962/1000 should indicate to you that the preparation materials above are sufficient. Right?

Can't get the damned "Gangnam style" out from my head. Geez.






Thursday, August 02, 2012

Atychiphobia


Suddenly I had this urge to write an entry after months of unintentional abandonment of this blog. "Unintentional" emphasized. C'mon, where got time taking care a pitiful blog which is not generating enough "ka-ching" to sustain my hunger for curiosity. Buy books, travels, being nerd, all need monies, agree?



Anyway, my part philosophical part empirical method of promoting the science of Failure generated few interesting insights.

Obviously, the idea of failure is wrongly understood by common mass. How say? People tend to shun potential failure unreasonably and without solid ground. Smart readers will notice I use the phrase "potential failure" instead of "absolute failure", this is because failure with likelihood of not failing could in turn mean likelihood for success. As usual, we want to avoid failure that could cause lives, significant financial impacts, bad ROI and all sort of outcomes where the actual/perceived cost outweigh actual/perceived benefit. If you're in the game, "High Risk High Return" should ring some bells, LOL.

It's all about risk management, like I always chanting to my co-workers.

Portfolio and Project Management -> Risk Management
Software R&D -> Risk Management
Financial Derivatives and Investment -> Risk Management
Career Planning -> Risk Management
Buy Life/Health/etc Insurance -> Risk Management

And the list grows longer and longer until you would have a reflex action closing the browser currently viewing this site.

The latest "sales" pitch of mine -> "Fail Fast, Fail Cheap, Fail Safe" managed to grab attention of the listeners whenever I used them in customer training sessions, motivational talks, project management meeting, coaching team members and even in interviews

:D Not bad as a way to get people to put their eyes and ears to you.

But I can't say the copyright of the phrase belongs to me as it relates to the works of many scientists, leaders, philosophers, mathematicians and all these successful people who contributely significantly to the society and nation. In the extreme case, they heroically "Fail Slow, Fail Pricey, Fail Deadly" to prove some hypothesises and perhaps to the betterment of mankind. Well, these cases were the end of the long tail if you know what I mean.

Anyway, to common man like us, probably more important is how the skill of failure affects our ability to reach optimal (even a local optima) state of our goals. If life is a constant deviation of any plan, then any plan should plan for deviation and if by definition any deviation is a failure, life is full with failures. It sucks right? Not really. Solution to any problem is the continous improvement of the sub-optimal/failed solution to the problem, monotonically. Well, biting my own tongue, to be precise, not always monotically, especially if you stucked in local optima and need to break out to find the global one.

With all due respects, always have the bigger and larger picture in your mind when failure is imminent or even planned. You will realize that you are moving one step further to success, just by failing.

Remember "Fail Fast, Fail Cheap, Fail Safe" Fail Fast -> Continous and Often Improvement
Fail Cheap -> Well, preserve the budget and $$$ for more trials
Fail Safe -> Don't screw up anything significant like your career, corporate reputation, life and so on.



Friday, March 23, 2012

COG-622: IBM Cognos 10 BI Administrator



This is a pretty simple test, perhaps due to the simplicity of Cognos 10 BI administration? Not really, I think the exam is out-of-sync to the actual administration needs of Cognos 10. Too many theoretical questions and the test misses the more essential adminitrative aspects and not reflective of a milestone that only a seasoned administrator will achieve. OR, most likely, I'm just too over qualified for it ;-)

My study materials are:

Cognos 10 Hand Book
Cognos 10 Architecture and Deployment Guide
Cognos 10 Installation and Configuration Guide
Cognos 10 Administration and Security Guide
Few VMs to play with

I have also developed a 3 days Cognos 10 Administration Boot Camp training course with tons of learning slides and hands-on labs.



Thursday, December 29, 2011

All eyes on German renewable energy efforts



FELDHEIM, Germany (AP) -- This tiny village of 37 gray homes and farm buildings clustered along the main road in a wind-swept corner of rural eastern Germany seems an unlikely place for a revolution.

Yet environmentalists, experts and politicians from El Salvador to Japan to South Africa have flocked here in the past year to learn how Feldheim, a village of just 145 people, is already putting into practice Germany's vision of a future powered entirely by renewable energy.

Chancellor Angela Merkel's government passed legislation in June setting the country on course to generate a third of its power through renewable sources — such as wind, solar, geothermal and bioenergy — within a decade, reaching 80 percent by 2050, while creating jobs, increasing energy security and reducing harmful emissions.

The goals are among the world's most ambitious, and expensive, and other industrialized nations from the U.S. to Japan are watching to see whether transforming into a nation powered by renewable energy sources can really work.

"Germany can't afford to fail, because the whole world is looking at the German model and asking, can Germany move us to new business models, new infrastructure?," said Jeremy Rifkin, a U.S. economist who has advised the European Union and Merkel.

In June, the nation passed the 20 percent mark for drawing electric power from a mix of wind, solar and other renewables. That compares with about 9 percent in the United States or Japan — both of which rely heavily on hydroelectric power, an energy source that has long been used.

Expanding renewables depends on the right mix of resources, as well as government subsidies and investment incentive — and a willingness by taxpayers to shoulder their share of the burden. Germans currently pay a 3.5 euro cent per kilowatt-hour tax, roughly euro157 ($205) per year for a typical family of four, to support research and investment in and subsidize the production and consumption of energy from renewable sources.

That allows for homeowners who install solar panels on their rooftops, or communities like Feldheim that build their own biogas plants, to be paid above-market prices for selling back to the grid, to ensure that their investment at least breaks even.

Critics, like the Institute for Energy Research, based in Washington, D.C., maintain such tariffs put an unfair burden of expanding renewables squarely on the taxpayer. At the same time, to make renewable energy work on the larger scale, Germany will have to pour billions into infrastructure, including updating its grid.

Key to success of the transformation will be getting the nation's powerful industries on board, to drive innovation in technology and create jobs. According to the Environment Ministry, overall investment in renewable energy production equipment more than doubled to euro29.4 billion ($38.44 billion) in 2011. Solid growth in the sector is projected through the next decade.

Some 370,000 people in Germany now have jobs in the renewable sector, more than double the number in 2004, a point used as proof that tax payers' investment is paying off.

Feldheim has zero unemployment — despite its tiny size — compared with roughly 30 percent in other villages in the economically depressed state of Brandenburg, which views investments in renewables as a ticket for a brighter future. Most residents work in the plant that produces biogas — fuel made by the breakdown of organic material such as plants or food waste — or maintain the wind and solar parks that provide the village's electricity.

"The energy revolution is already taking place right here," says Werner Frohwitter, spokesman for the Energiequelle company that helped set up and run Feldheim's energy concept.

But it's not only in the country. Earlier this month in Berlin, officials unveiled a prototype of a self-sustaining, energy-efficient home, built from recycled materials and complete with electric vehicles that can be charged in its garage.

The aim of the prototype home is to produce twice as much energy as is used by a family of four — chosen from a willing pool of volunteers who will be selected to live in the home for 15 months — through a combination of solar photovoltaics and energy management technology, in order to show the technology already exists to allow people to be energy self-sufficient.

"We want to show people that already today it is possible to live completely from renewable energy," said German Transport Minister Peter Ramsauer as the project, dubbed "Efficiency House Plus," was unveiled. The house is part of a wider euro1.2 million ($1.57 million) project investing in energy-efficient buildings.

"The Efficiency House Plus will set standards that can be adopted by the majority in the short term," Ramsauer told The Associated Press. "The basic principle is that the house produces more energy than needed to live. The extra energy is then used to charge electric-powered cars and bicycles or sold back to the public grid."

Germany's four leading car makers are also participating in the project with BMW AG, Daimler AG, Volkswagen AG and Opel, which is part of Buick's parent company, General Motors Co., each making an E-car for use by in the home.

Such strong cooperation between Germany's industrial sector coupled with a political landscape that emphasizes stability and a heightened public ecological sensibility makes Germany fertile ground to lead the way in the transformation from a post-carbon economy to one run on renewable energy.

"Germany has the most robust industrial economy per capita. When you talk about industrial revolution, that's Germany. It's German technology, it's German IT, it's German commutation," said Rifkin, who outlines what he calls the "The Third Industrial Revolution," in a newly released book of the same title that explains how the economies in the future could swap fossil fuels for renewable energies and still maintain growth.

Robert Pottmann, an asset manager with Munich Re, one of the world's biggest reinsurers, says the company seeks to invest about euro2.5 billion ($3.27 billion) in the next few years in renewable energy assets such as "wind farms, solar projects or maybe new electricity grids."

Alan Simpson, an independent energy and climate adviser from Britain who visited Feldheim as part of a wider tour of Germany last month to see what the renewable revolution looks like up close said it was inspiring to view what is being accomplished on the ground.

"It's great to think about Germany delivering on everything that we are being told in Great Britain is impossible," Simpson said.

Amid the excitement, there is also an awareness of the real need for the German experiment to succeed.

"If Germany can't pull this off," said Rifkin. "We don't have a plan B."

___

Associated Press writer Juergen Baetz contributed to this story from Berlin.
busi


Facebook unwelcome in Vietnam, but Zuckerberg OK




HANOI, Vietnam (AP) — Vietnam may block its citizens from using Facebook, but that didn't stop website founder Mark Zuckerberg from vacationing in the communist country.

Zuckerberg spent Christmas Eve in the popular tourist destination Ha Long Bay, local official Trinh Dang Thanh says.

State-run media say Zuckerberg arrived in Vietnam on Dec. 22.

Zuckerberg spent Christmas Day at an ecolodge in the northern mountain town of Sapa and rode a buffalo, said Le Phuc Thien, deputy manager at Topas Ecolodge.

Zuckerberg, Facebook's 27-year-old CEO, founded the social networking site in 2004.

Vietnam's aggressive Internet censors block access to Facebook and other websites, but young Vietnamese easily bypass the restrictions.

Copyright © 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved


Wednesday, December 21, 2011

TOGAF 9.0 CERTIFIED



After I passed my TOGAF foundation two months back and with additional two months of preparation and extensive study of TOGAF 9.0 specification, I finally settled my TOGAF Certified certification.

The exam was a tough one, depending on how you perceive it. It is questionably easy to pass without a thorough understanding of the topics as many exam takers commented that you just need to pick the longest answer or the most TOGAFish answer. However when you really spend time to delve into each of the scenarios' questions and relate it to available answers, it demands serious understanding and application of the knowledge in TOGAF in order to figure out the best possible answer. The open book nature of the examination allows candidate to cross examine their answer, however only useful if only the candidate knows where to find related information in the book efficiently since TOGAF covers lots of topical grounds in the book.

My score was 85% which means for 2 out of the 8 questions, I had chosen the suboptimal answer. Too bad I don't know which one I screwed up. Too bad.

This is just the start of a wonderful journey with TOGAF certified title. Well done!

Friday, October 21, 2011

TOGAF Foundation

A long awaited first architect level certification of mine, though foundational level, serves as a catalyst to boost value for my employer and clients. It is not a tough paper to pass, comparing to its Part 2 brother. I listed the materials that I used for examination preparation below:


  • TOGAF Version 9.0 documentation (Optional but recommended, especially if you are like me going for Part 2 soon)

  • TOGAF 9.0 Foundation Study Guide (Sufficient to pass part 1 but hardly flying color)

  • Misc. TOGAF 9.0 Summary documents (For understanding only)

  • Few years of architecting experiences (Optional but useful for really understand TOGAF values)


My score was 93% which is aligned with my usual passing standard. I think preparation works for Part 2 would be more interesting because it requires drilling deep into in-and-out of TOGAF 9 specification. Sounds fun!



Thursday, October 13, 2011

Making sure XBRL kissing and not kicking you!




During the course of my professional career, may it be in business or information technology, I have seen and heard innumerable hypes and promises of disrupting standards, paradigms, solutions and technology advancements. Usually, mega-vendors with plentiful of marketing capital will succeed in planting seeds to gain buy-in and yet losing momentum when the trend reaching a critical mass of demystification and finally the bubble busted and they move on to another vicious cycle of hype-high-haunt. History is likely to repeat itself and what businesses can do to protect their valuable capitals is to put in the right perspective and context in understanding the impact and risk in adopting certain approach to meet competitive advantage demand, market pressures, regulatory (BNM NSRS ISS) requirements and et cetera.


Life’s tough but that’s life.





I would like to focus the spotlight in this post to be pertinent about Extensible Business Reporting Language, or commonly known as XBRL. I think I will most likely skip all the boilerplate explanation and description of what XBRL is and some common sense facts about it that you and I can reason without any significant efforts. I am more interested in shedding light about best practices, prevention measures, implementation management and techniques for making sure proper alignments between domains of business, data, application and technology.


To make this even more interesting, I am also doing some thoughts about topics such as BPO model to XBRL, the problem of agility mismatch and other matters.


Just close your eyes and imagine for a while the ideal state of anything that is perfectly blended into our life. How would we perceive them? The ideal case is that we don’t even need to know about their existence since they are so well blended into our daily routines or activities; we just take them for granted. For instance, we don’t need to know how an automobile’s engine works in order to drive a car. We can study about them if we have the luxury of time and resources, and at our will.


Same scenario is here for XBRL. The current proliferation of standalone XBRL conversion tool demands understanding of intricacies of XBRL to fully harness the real benefits of XBRL. The fact that these tools are standalone, single purpose built applications meant the chasms to enable seamless information flow is predicted to be more challenging than a proper solution with a long term interoperability vision. Information management in XBRL can be chaotic without built-in functionalities within the tools to perform auditing, archiving, versioning, automated and human workflow process for validation. The business might ends up with a mess of thousands of scattered XBRL taxonomies and instances with no tractable ways to consolidate them.


Have something better and let standalone XBRL conversion tool be the last resort.




My point is clear and obvious, a standalone tool could be suffice for relatively small company with human manageable size and complexity of XBRL artefacts, however it is not suitable for large corporations such as financial institutions, conglomerates and federal agencies. Operational expenditure of using standalone XBRL tool is forecasted to be exceedingly high compared to an enterprise grade XBRL solution. Next is the impact to the corporation’s evolve-ability and maturity level in enterprise data management, especially when XBRL artefacts are not meant to be the end, but only a means to the standardized information sharing platform. This is one critical area where technological advancement is needed to accelerate the adoption of XBRL because it is virtually hard to find commercial data integration tools that can natively process XBRL format. At the moment, these tools can only parse and understand XML format. XML and XBRL are not the same, we all should know by now right? One of the database vendors is coming up with a database vault that can process XBRL natively; however we are yet to see their releases and feature sets.
Aim for centralized management and governance model.

The sole action of buying a standalone XBRL conversion tool without a much higher level enterprise planning process is like buying and driving a car in a poor city planning area where you have no idea whether there is proper road in front of you. Still, the car will move and you might eventually reach your destination, well, predictably in a stochastic and risky way. The bottom line to use a standalone XBRL conversion toll is that even if you have decided to adopt the tool, please request your vendor or internal governance team to come up with a comprehensive strategy and future transitioning plan for it.



Prioritize and focus on the business values.




Avoid been inundated with XBRL related jargons and terminology because a well-planned business application using XBRL shall abstract most of these technicalities from business users, even power users. I know the in-and-out of XBRL because I spent quite a fair amount of time in understanding their specifications and business orientation. At the basic, XBRL got at least 3 specifications to be understood plus all the related XML related specifications; I bet my clients won’t have the luxury of resources to skimp them thoroughly. On top of everything, there are global standards such as IFRS, US-GAAP, GRI and many more to be adhered to govern a business. So, when possible, procure a complete business solution that designed at the proper level of technical abstractions.


Know your opponent’s agility.

In a regulatory landscape where regulator (e.g. BNM NSRS ISS) requires monitoring and compliance submission information from regulated entities, these entities should know the capability and agility of their regulator to pick the right XBRL solution. Let me explain the idea in more details. You see, regulator is implementing XBRL solution for say regular financial statement submissions from regulated entities. There are valid rationales and implications of why they do so. One of them is to progressively increase their capability of requesting and consuming more detailed, more frequent and more accurate information and catch up with regional and global peer pressures in adopting evolving industry standards.


Once the regulator possesses this agility, regulated entities will face what I coined the problem of agility mismatch, if they didn’t level up in this playing field. To meet the initial regulatory and compliance requirements mandated by regulator using the new XBRL platform is relatively simple for basically whichever approach that regulated entities adopted, may it be standalone XBRL tool, and enterprise integrated solution or even pure human solution. The real issue is the size, complexity and interval of future changes that regulated entities faced. Regulated entities most likely will caught in a downward spiral of catching up with the reporting changes. Money can be spent better elsewhere don’t you think so?


XBRL is at the centre of information nexus.

It is very ideal indeed to position XBRL like this and I think is risky because supporting tools, standards and technologies are not there yet to reinforce the implementation. Nonetheless, XBRL can really be used to supplement the organization’s effort in consolidating master data, reference data, metadata and their governance initiatives. Don’t lock the value of XBRL in a silo. XBRL is significantly much better than any ad-hoc and in-house standardization efforts such as creating a XML based data sharing format, standardized document structures and tons of other such things you and I have seen. XBRL is developed to solve many of these repeating and known problems. Why not leverages XBRL but reinvents this ugly wheel?


Lastly of this post, I don’t favour the idea of engaging a BPO vendor to take care of the organization needs to be transited to the paradigm where XBRL is used for regulatory and compliance requirements. I think XBRL is here to stay and getting more ubiquitous, pervasive and critical for businesses to stay relevant, competitive and agile. XBRL can be a socio-technical object transforming the way we handle business information.


I will write more of my thoughts out in the future about this topic. Pen down.






Sunday, September 04, 2011

Angel and Devil Talks



Does Cognitive Dissonance ring a bell to you? It may be or not but it sure be wise and beneficial to know about it. If H. sapiens is one of a kind of species that is complex and sophisticated enough to establish its dictatorship over this planet, it could imply a deeper understanding of it exerts a more powerful grasp over our own survival than a variety of other technological advances.



In layman chats about human behavioural predictions, we hear assertions that it is usually impossible or technically impractical to accurately predict how a person will behave given a set of constantly changing parameters such as environmental, emotional, intentional and so and so. How true is that?

Recent advancement in the fields of psychology signifies nothing but only the greater chasm we have to fully comprehend us ourselves. There are so much potential in mining the knowledge about our own thinking. See how Steve Job manages to turn around the fate of Apple by just designing a few human-friendly and laziness-tweaked devices? What he did was an art as artistry is always a precursor and a plain convenient way to express something not fully comprehended to be designated as engineering.

It is both aspirational and inspiring when I tried to apply a structure on the basis of psychology study to my usual thoughts and reasonings. A very basic Cognitive Dissonance theory could sheds more lights about decision making processes than you banging your head on the wall a zillion times, pun intended.

Want to know more about Cognitive Dissonance? As usual, google it up. Or if you believe in me, this thing is just like your inner Angel and Devil seducing you in doing something :)

Sunday, July 03, 2011

Geez, where have I been?

Staring at the last post of mine and couldn't be more agree that time really flies. 9 freaking months that I haven't done anything with this blog and as a matter of fact, 9 freakishly busy months that I'm totally into the pithole of works. Anyway, hope I can post something soon.

Yummmmmmm Sheng!!




Friday, August 20, 2010

What Does StarCraft2 Brought On The Table



It's been awhile since I played a PC game that requires more than few hours job. If not mistaken, my last was Diablo2. Emm, that's like what, 10 years ago?

I'm excited few weeks back when knowing sc2 is going to be released. Colleagues of mine went frenzy about this, and the next days most of their MSN were tagged with sc2related status post. And for me, I don't have luxury of spare time to make up with it.

WTH.




Falling sick. Literally.

White, Orange, Black, Red and White. I wonder where's the little blue?



So the enlightment of sc2 and physical fatigue added up and glued me nicely on my couch.

Flashback. Year 2010.

Crappy year, I'd concluded.




Peanut sized pay increment, groundnut scaled bonus better-than-nothing ang pau, worse-than-expected pink form programme, tighther-than-ever working time, greater but shallower learning landscape, lousy salary and deteriorating health. I can list more, but I guess that's enough.

A phrase crossed my mind. Brain Drain. You can't beat it, You join it.

Yawl.


Time to step back. Time to let go.
Time to ignore. Time to have some fun.
Time to sleep.

Yawl.


Tuesday, August 17, 2010

XBRL for Dummies



After I fiddled my time with skimping through specification of XBRL 2.1, XBRL Dimensions 1.0 and XLink 1.1, I decided to get untechnical for a glimpse. Here you go, XBRL for Dummies, written by Charles Hoffman aka Father of XBRL and Liv Watson, one of the founders of XBRL.

400+ damned pages albeit pretty light materials, it took me few days to finish the reading. Although the depth is shallow since the book is for Dummies, it provides quite delicate coverage of XBRL regime with pointers to case studies, reference materials, state of the art landscape of products and services and some enlightments of how to make value out from XBRL. It's definitely one of the up-to-date introductory literature you just can't miss.




Monday, August 02, 2010

Facebook Deactivation



I'd posted up a status update in my Facebook account like few weeks back, saying that my will to stop using its services and not many people seem to believe it. And Ta Da, I deactivated my account yesterday. As a matter of fact, I can't find a link called Delete My Account, so I just settled down with Deactivation. Googled and found that you can actually delete your account but only through a relatively lengthy procedure. Nevermind, deactivation it is.

Face swelling finally subsided and I'm taking some "hard" food today. Can you imagine 2-3 days intakes of food limited to stuffs like mashed potatoes, plain congee, milk and ice creams (no complains on this!)? Cravings are crawling around.

It DO costs you to mess with Wisdom!

O ya, when I read a paper about how XBRL is being analyzed from a postsocial approach and as a socio-technical object, Facebook crossed my mind. I'm curious whether there's any similar study on FB. Maybe yes, but no time for me to look further.



Sunday, August 01, 2010

Essentials of XBRL



While my recuperation from Wisdom extraction is in progress, I managed to finish the reading of this book during the dull weekend. Pains still intact though.

This book is targeted for the audience from the group of C-level, hence you can imagine how above-50,000-feets the materials can be. Nonetheless, it does provide a very important perspective on how XBRL can portrait itself as a valuable corporate asset and not just another technology.

It is only 200+ pages and with a lot of spaces in between the lines for easy sighting of old folks. Lolx.

Anyway, the book is focused on elaborating the evolutionary power of XBRL in the accounting field, particularly how it will transform accounting firms and corporate accounting department. However, I guess it would be more valuable if it can includes more emphasis on other stakeholders such as regulators and software vendors and not just a breeze on them.

Moving forward.



Friday, July 30, 2010

My Naked Wisdom, Literally

Wisdom was troubling me occasionally with residuals and inflammations and this got on my nerves recently when I can't help myself but uncontrollably flirting with its' surroundings with my tongue to calm the irritations.

DMDL!

Went to dentist that did my root canal few weeks back and taught Wisdom a lesson.

Before the extraction:



See how Wisdom collided with its' neighbour?

After the extraction (Pic at the top right):



The process took around 30 - 45 minutes with drillings, crackings and hackings sound. At one point in time, I felt like my jaw bones were shattered into pieces.


Show time. I present to you my naked Wisdom in blood (R-rated):



Post-op gonna be a PITA experience, hope no dry socket forms.


DMDL, Die Mah Die Lo
PITA, Pain In The Ass



Saturday, June 26, 2010

The Telco Churn Management Hand Book By Rob Mattison





I've finished the reading of this book as part of the preparation works for one incoming POC exercise. Not a hefty one, just a near 400 pages traverse of churn related matter in telecommunications industry. It did inspired me about some direction about how to better concoct an arsenal of stuffs to tackle churn. The book is pretty high level in the sense that besides the strategic direction and some tactical means of handling churn, it doesn't really craft down any specific implementation models which directly adaptable. It is inspiring yet you will crack your head yourself to think about the how-to.

Read it here

Time is running out and I got to do more knowledge churning.. literally!


Friday, June 25, 2010

SOA BIAN SOA BIAN




I've attended a presentation by an architect from a well known banking vendor just now. It was about adoption of SOA thingy into new product development. I gotta admit that I'm not at all convinced how by adopting SOA in application development can entice direct buying interest of BUSINESS decision makers, other than having the nice-to-have SOA enabled logo there and appease the techno-geek never-ending appetite of playing with state-of-the-art toys. Of course, my words might be too strong here but nonetheless my point is made:

SOA makes no value to a business if you can't justify its business values.


Hardcore proponents of SOA will probably start to shout at me, I guess. :p


"It enhances business agility"
"It improves time-to-market for new products"
"It helps to make the IT alignment to business needs"
"It embraces changes"
.... many mores COMMON praises of why you should have SOA in your complex environment.



I'd agreed with all the benefits of SOA, sincerely. Most importantly I strongly seconded that SOA indeed provides a very scalable and agile platform for software product development. As a matter of fact, it shares similar qualities with methodologies such as XP, MDA, Agile, albeit at a level of abstraction higher up.


"Most businesses are not being pressured enough by its environments to move to think about SOA"

"My business generates enough shareholder value that guarantees my big fat bonus and decent dividend payout, why I bother to take this risk?"



"SOA is not for the faint-of-heart!"

Interestingly, after I typed the phrase above, I did a search in Google and found this article that coincided with my opinion. Click here to read

One of the statement made by the architect that I couldn't disagree more was the "fact" that adopting SOA doesn't change the way business is conducted.

The value maximization of SOA approach shall be realized if and only if the business leverages on it to make the business process more agile, to alleviate process bottleneck due to IT inagility and to flexibly infuse process innovation. If you are an avid reader, you realized that I mentioned the word Process three times. :p
I just want to stress how important to view the impacts of SOA from the perspective of how it could change business processes and perhaps the entire business model of the company.


"80/20 should be 80% about BPM, 20% for the rest. Not the other way around."


Here is a hilarious article you should read about. Click here to read

I need to re-emphasize here: For all intents and purposes, SOA development approach is the best option we have for software development now, but it will not be cheap and easy to adopt. Higher setup cost and steeper learning curves are just few of many caveats that warrant a big post sign "BEWARE". High risk high return?

Let's ask ourselves. If you are the CTO/CIO in a complex organization with many existing IT assets such as a large bank, how high the ranking will it be for SOA project(s) in your priority list. IMHO, it will be way too low that you might just miss it. Why? IT'S TOO F**KING TECHNICAL and your boss is shouting for corporate capability such as proactive customer acquisition management or straight-through trading thingy.


"Don't be so shortsighted"


In fact, I'm not. I've been through enough tech fads and unplesant reality to draw my conclusion and I think further enough to cover more than just the main success scenario.

The rule of thumb is anything that tries to improve an organization at the scale of enterprise wide requires enterprise wide commitments. To name a few examples:


Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW)
Enterprise Churn Management
"SOA"!
...



Any of the above is easy target for cruel reality check. I've seen EDW effort that turned out to be a huge isolated data mart used by few departments and eventually serves to be a source system to another EDW effort that subsequently failed too. Given this wonderful history of fad-goes-bust cycle, it could be a premonition for SOA initiatives.

I strongly suggest for any SOA project to deliver quick win results to convince a larger scale of commitments into its' accomplishments.


Think Business Always!
It's all about bottomline, revenue, cost and growth.


Pointed application, semantic stuffs? Emmm... KIV.
BIAN, metamodel, service landscape? Emmm... Still evolving.

Only 1 in 5 SOA Projects Actually Succeed

State of SOA Survey 2010

Only with all the critical success factors met, i.e. top management commitments of enterprise adoption and enforcement, standards-based and tools-based SOA infrastructures and clear-crispy SOA policy, procedures and best practices, we should be able to increase the likelihood of delivering an envious successful SOA project (Enterprise wide!), else it will be just another SILO, a pricey one.